Wednesday, April 13, 2011


Can We Get an Energy Plan, Please?

By Stephen Lacey, Editor
April 13, 2011


The last month was a big one for energy. Oil prices reached two-and-a-half year highs; Japan dealt with a nuclear power plant on the verge of a meltdown; the one-year anniversary of the Gulf Oil disaster neared; and the International Energy Agency, historically known as an interest group for oil producing nations, issued a report calling a more aggressive build-out of clean energy to offset declining oil production and climate change.
Click to play podcast

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Published: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 at 12:59 p.m.
SACRAMENTO — Gov. Jerry Brown on Tuesday signed legislation requiring California utilities to get one-third of their power from renewable sources, giving the state the most aggressive alternative energy mandate in the U.S.
California utilities and other electricity providers have until the end of 2020 to draw 33 percent of their power from solar panels, windmills and other renewable sources.
Brown signed the bill at a solar panel manufacturing plant near San Jose.
"There are people who think we can drill our way to happiness and prosperity," the Democratic governor told hundreds of plant workers and other supporters gathered to witness the signing. "Instead of just taking oil from thousands of miles away, we're taking the sun and converting it."
Previous California law required utilities to get 20 percent of their power from renewable sources.
Supporters of the higher standard said it will reassure investors and keep money flowing to develop alternative energy sources. They say that will lead to cleaner air and job growth in the clean-energy sector.
"Instead of watching from the sidelines, America needs to get back in the clean energy race, and that's exactly what California is doing," said Stephanie Mueller, spokeswoman for the U.S. Department of Energy.
Critics of the legislation said sticking with traditional energy sources such as coal and natural gas would be cheaper, keeping costs down for business and residential ratepayers. Business groups point to estimates that the higher standard could drive up electricity costs for California ratepayers by more than 7 percent, despite language in the legislation to limit cost increases.
"Industry in California already pays electricity rates about 50 percent higher than the rest of the country," said Gino DiCaro, spokesman for the California Manufacturers and Technology Association. "With 33 percent, those rates are going to go up even more."
Brown said he would look carefully at whether the new standard will drive up electricity costs but said increasing use of renewable sources makes sense for California and the country.
"I know one thing: Being dependent on foreign fossil fuel is not good for our economy, it's not good for our security, and it's not good for our climate," the Democratic governor told The Associated Press in a telephone interview. "We have to be bold."
Making California less reliant on fossil fuels will benefit the state's air quality and make oil supply a smaller factor in America's foreign policy, said state Sen. Joe Simitian, who carried the legislation.
The Democrat from Palo Alto was instrumental in setting the current renewable power standard at 20 percent and has been working for four years to get the increase to 33 percent.
Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed an earlier version of the bill but issued an executive order that called for 33 percent renewable power by 2020. Simitian kept pushing to get the higher standard written into state law, which is harder to undo than an executive order.
When his bill died on the Senate floor as the 2010 legislative session ended, Simitian said the action sent a chill through the renewable power generation market. Supporters said the new bill sends a clear signal to financial backers that demand for renewable power will keep growing.
"It really comes down to whether a bank will loan you money to build a facility," said Jan Smutny-Jones, executive director of the Independent Energy Producers, a coalition of electricity generators that produce about 80 percent of California's renewable power.
California power generation is just short of receiving 20 percent from renewable sources. About 57 percent of in-state generation in 2009 came from natural gas, with about 15 percent from nuclear power plants and 12 percent from large hydroelectric generators.
Because utilities are close to meeting the previous requirement for renewable power, the investors who provide the money to build hundreds of megawatts of generating capacity under construction this year would have put away their checkbooks in the next year or two, said Dan Adler, president of the California Clean Energy Fund.
The higher state standards give lenders confidence that there will be long-term demand for renewable energy and that their loans will be repaid, said Adler, whose $30 million nonprofit investment fund backs 40 companies developing green energy technology.
Meeting the higher standard is expected to require tens of billions of dollars in capital investment for generation equipment and transmission lines, with expenses ultimately passed along to ratepayers of the state's investor-owned and municipal utilities.
The bill includes language that would require the California Public Utilities Commission to set reasonable limits for what utilities should have to pay and allows the standards to be relaxed if not enough renewable power or transmission capacity is available to meet them.
California's largest utility, Pacific Gas & Electric Co., has supported higher renewable standards but opposed Simitian's bill, saying the legislation does not include adequate safeguards against excessive costs. PG&E wants to work with the Brown administration to put specific measures in follow-up legislation, company spokeswoman Lynsey Paulo said.

Source:
http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20110412/WIRE/110419884/1350?p=1&tc=pg

New Senate Bill May Add $50 Million to California Solar Initiative Budget

Senate Bill (SB) 585, introduced on Feb. 17 by Senator Christine Kehoe (D-San Diego), will add a new section to the Public Utilities Code to lift the cap on the total cost of the California Solar Initiative (CSI) Program and change it to a cap on the amount that can be collected from customers through the utilities. An additional $50 million may be added to CSI thanks to the legislation.

The bill comes at an important time as CSI funding for commercial, government and nonprofit organizations has been exhausted for customers of Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) and San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E).

Started in 2007, the $2.167 billion CSI Program was expected to continue through 2016. However, at the end of 2010 funding for nonresidential solar systems, including schools, government buildings and businesses, was exhausted PG&E and SDG&E territories, and all new projects in these territories since then have been placed on a waiting list.

Senator Kehoe's bill will allow for additional money to be added to the CSI Program that is currently not allowed due to the cap on the total cost. The bill was passed by a unanimous vote by the Senate Committee on Energy, Utilities and Communications at the committee hearing on April 5, 2011.

Source: From CSI Newsletter